Page MenuHomeAleph Objects Inc

Up date to the Taz Pro Quality Assurance Record
Closed, ResolvedPublic

Description

It has been asked that checking for zip ties and a general loose screws be added to the Frame and Y axis Quality Assurance Records.

Event Timeline

wolffchadd triaged this task as Normal priority.
wolffchadd created this object with edit policy "LulzBot Hardware Products (Project)".
DaniAO added a subscriber: DaniAO.Apr 25 2019, 11:24 AM

We have 1000 plus of these already ordered, so that will be an updated that is added later on.

kent reassigned this task from kent to DaniAO.EditedMay 21 2019, 3:25 PM

@DaniAO, as part of this bugfix we need a new PN because we split out the final QA from the calibration QA. Can you create a new DC-MS PN for Calibration QA record? We can probably re-use the PN for the final QA record, unless that will be too confusing. If so, we will need a new PN for that too. Currently the file names for the QA checksheet have placeholders in the T6814-T6848-T6806-T6924-T6853-T6852-QA-checksheets branch.

We will need to export pdf and make print shop files too once these are validated.

None of the QA are on the BoM's any more, as we are printing them in house and treating them as consumables. Do you still need a part number for that then?

kent added a comment.May 21 2019, 3:37 PM

@DaniAO That's a good question and I don't know the answer. I thought every part that we needed to build a printer had to be on the BoM.

Not if its a consumable- we don't have the black strapping on the bom as it's considered a consumable. Same idea with these.

@kent you can save some time and not create a "print shop" version since we will be print them in house.

DaniAO reassigned this task from DaniAO to kent.May 22 2019, 8:51 AM
kent added a comment.May 28 2019, 10:52 AM

redlines received from @bowman will work on these some time this week.

kent reassigned this task from kent to DaniAO.Jun 12 2019, 1:32 PM

@DaniAO these are updated with the redlines that we made in the T6814-T6848-T6806-T6924-T6853-T6852-QA-checksheets branch. @wolffchadd @bowman can you review these and let me know if any further changes need made?

@kent I don't think Bob or Wolff can pull from the repos to check these out, or are familiar with pulling from branches.

Any way to email or attach them in the ticket for their review?

kent added a comment.Jun 12 2019, 2:56 PM

kent added a subscriber: MikeR.

There was an update to the frame checksheet as a result of T6233, now it looks like this.

@wolffchadd @bowman have either of you had a chance to review these yet?

Yes, they look good for the pg 1 side. I need to review them with Christian as well as to what we want to put as common issues/noted other issues for the pg 2 side.
Also review / refine the process of how we are going to use them to collect data with.

kent closed this task as Resolved.Mon, Jun 24, 9:52 AM

@bowman thanks for reviewing these. I incorporated the fix for T8215 and merged these to master.