Page MenuHomeAleph Objects Inc

EL-HR0150: Cable diagram got overwritten by another change
Closed, ResolvedPublic

Description

I have a first article from CCX for revision B but are repo only has a revision A in it.

Event Timeline

oliver created this task.Mon, Jun 10, 7:42 AM
oliver triaged this task as Unbreak Now! priority.
west added a comment.Mon, Jun 10, 7:45 AM

@oliver what do they look like? They shouldnt have been reved at all past A unless there was confusion when sending redgum harnesses

@west The revision B that I have in my hands had a diode added to it in revision B. Was this a possible change for red gum?

west added a subscriber: adam.Mon, Jun 10, 7:56 AM

Redgums harness was changed for EMI. We added a TVS diode. Its possible that there was confusion when sending that drawing, although it has its own separate part number. I could have originally reved, then realized that that would affect the quiver harness then a new part number to separate quiver from redgum. @adam do you have some insight on this?

adam added a comment.Mon, Jun 10, 8:03 AM

The only thing I can think of is that the drawing was modified and was sent without updating the part number to the redgum specific part number.

@sherylb @kim For EL-HR0150, were were ordering for the Taz Pro or the Taz Workhorse?

west added a comment.Mon, Jun 10, 8:23 AM

150 goes on quiver
185 goes on redgum

adam added a comment.Mon, Jun 10, 8:25 AM

@oliver which PO did these come in on - that should narrow down which machine we ordered these for.

west added a comment.Mon, Jun 10, 8:41 AM

In the PO it says rev A for 150

oliver added a comment.EditedMon, Jun 10, 10:14 AM

@west So I talked to @kim about this but at this moment, the FA is going to have to be a fail since this is for a TAZ Pro. Also it says on the EL-HR0150 diagram that they sent back to us, the change to Rev B was made on 4/30.

west added a comment.Mon, Jun 10, 10:18 AM

what does rev b have?

@west it added the diode

adam added a comment.Mon, Jun 10, 10:51 AM

@oliver @kim @sherylb - the story goes like this: when we knew we needed the diode for redgum, @west rev'ed the quiver harness because it should not affect the functionality of quiver. The problem with this solution was that we would need to go back through EMI and UL testing to make this change to quiver. Once that had been explained, the diode version was created as a new part number (EL-HR0185) and EL-HR0150 was reverted to rev A. I believe that purchasing was notified when we created the new part number specifically for redgum, but they may not have been notified that the repo for quiver was reverted to rev A on this drawing. Currently the quiver repo has rev A of this part so it's possible that CCX was working from a drawing sent between updating quiver harness drawing and the decision to make a new part number for redgum.
@oliver you are correct that these harnesses would fail FA for EL-HR0150. They probably pass FA for EL-HR0185. I don't know the least confusing way to address this, but if we can let them know that the ones they delivered are good for EL-HR0185 and have them redo a set as EL-HR0150 that might save us some money and time instead of requoting FAs for EL-HR0185 and EL-HR0150.

kim added a comment.Mon, Jun 10, 11:05 AM

Note: Harness EL-HR0150 Rev A that we have received First articles notedRev B are actually EL-HR0185 Rev B not EL-HR0150.
I will ask CCX to re-quote EL-HR0150 REV A again- and procure another First Article 5 pcs

DaniAO closed this task as Resolved.Thu, Jun 13, 7:51 AM
DaniAO claimed this task.
DaniAO added a subscriber: DaniAO.

This appears to be sorted so closing this one out.