- User Since
- Jun 11 2015, 7:17 AM (218 w, 3 d)
Tue, Aug 13
Double checking ABS enclosure for Mini we post:
been 1.5mo since response, closing this one out.
@Orias Can we get a second set of eyes on this source to see if anything else is required before pushing to dl.lb.com?
@bigmansas If replacing the bed did not fix the issue, chances are a mosfet issue or wiring issue.
Mon, Aug 12
verifying STL name clarification, should be good after that.
@adam I am not seeing a purchase price on this one in the system. Can you check that and update PP-MP0184 with that cost? I can set a price afterwards
@youngmrcarlson Sounds good. Can be sold, price set at $1.25 each. Let us know if you get any push back on that pricing!
Also is this a replacement part they are ordering? They should have the hardware to install it as is.
@youngmrcarlson Indeed, i see the extra value add on. Just to make this feasible from our standpoint (mainly just the man hours to set them up) these are going to be about $1.20 per screw whereas they would be paying ~$0.17 per screw elsewhere. Just not sure at what point the "convenience" becomes negative to justify the costs. Any thoughts on that point or perspective?
@youngmrcarlson We generally try to stay away from selling the random hardware pieces as they are fairly easily sourced elsewhere: https://www.google.com/search?q=M2+x+0.4+mm%2C+Black-Oxide+Alloy+Steel%2C+Class+10.9%2C+6mm+Long&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&client=firefox-b-1-e
@adam I know we have ~15 on Quotes from sales, and i believe we will be adding it to education bundles for workhorse as well. Do we want to consider some stock at a SW location? 10-20 will not cover us for more than 1week once sales gets the go ahead to send these out in force.
@DRobertson I just wanted to check in on this one, I believe it was covered on a different ticket for the same OHAI?
@Heather I believe we are trying to keep stock at AM for the time being. I feel 100 units for intial order should be a good starting point.
@logan We will need these updated for reviewer printers coming back.
Need .svg and .pdf of individual pieces for product page
Sounds good, we will leave them off the website for now. Let us know if that changes.
Aye, I don't think we will be selling many of them and mainly see the issue for RMA's.
@kent I had geany set as default for csv's, opening in calc came through exactly as ods. think we are good to remove ods if csv is preferred.
Fri, Aug 9
Awaiting feedback from @kent on monday to close out regarding cvs and ods BoM
Machined part drawings
I went ahead and added a BoM for both csv and ods format
@Kazkade OCA BoM has been completed under KT-CP0150.
Labels have been added to OCA BoM, going to close this one out as we will not be sending sample filament with the tool head.
Need final BoM in cvs and ods format
Front and rear label added to OCA BoM
I accidentally pushed this one to T9063
Going to leave this one open until we get word from @kent on including a ods along with the cvs for the BoM.
@DaniAO As the csvs are a little harder to view from a customer perspective, do you know if there would be an objection to keeping both?
@logan This one looks like we have all source there, anything else you can think of?
Updated csv to ods on this commit: 5d75e6f515ce
Awaiting updated instructions from PS before closing this one out.
Updated names for gcode and STL files on these commits:
@Orias Lets go ahead and update the directions with this verification
Thu, Aug 8
@nathan We need computer specs on this ticket, not all our devs have access to OCA
Wed, Aug 7
AFAIK, buildtak is just PEI. They recommend this for the polymax PC, have we tried to print this material straight on PEI in cluster?
Checking the spec sheets from polymaker, it looks like PolyMax (formerly PC-Max) has a vicant softening temperature of 117c while the COPA has a vicant softening temperature of 180c.
I changed the file path for the Quick Start Guide from Documentation/qsg/ to documentation/quick_start_guide
@franklin Ahh my apologies, I thought we had enough pieces there for a build along with testing. We will get another set printed and inserted.
@franklin That is great to hear, we appreciate the update. Do you have an ETA on when the drop test can be done?
Tue, Aug 6
We attempted something similar early on in the merge from Cura Legacy. The issue when setting up profiles like this, it will lead to a super long list where selecting a "quality" setting will show each and every profile for every material. For example the TAZ 6 with standard extruder currently has over 117 profiles, making all profiles available without the material classification would require customers to scroll through all of these making them unrealistic.
@nathan We will take this one into consideration, but we will need to do some digging/testing before we can implement it across the board.
My apologies, this ticket should have been merged to T8849. We are going to need a new production tag unfortunately.
@DaniAO Are you aware of any other Mini 2 changes in process? ^^
@Steven Do we need another production tag to get this on download? Right now we have 22.214.171.124 in the 2.0.6 tag:
Mon, Aug 5
Sounds great here: