@west it should be fine in this case, since we are making the model match the drawing, and only the drawing is referenced as being a specific revision.

Drawing updated, pushed, and emailed to @jessica to get to suppliers. Any further changes will necessitate an additional revision increment.

@west since the rev G was shared with vendors on or around the 10th, is this latest change now revision H?

@kent looks good

@west I noticed that on my test version the dimension that is showing 6.50 in yours was showing 6.46 in mine. Does the model match the drawing? The drawing itself looks good, I just want to check that.

KT-HB0013 now has documentation

AS-HB0005 now has documentation

@kent looks good

@kent delete and remake. Dimensions done in the new workbench can be updated, but the ones in the old workbench need to be remade.

@kent
5.5 vertical distance to hole added in Josh rev B should be 5.50 to match the original change by West
arrows on hole location callout are a different style than all the other arrows
2.6 distance in upper left is redundant. should be removed, and the depth of the c-bore added. that appears to have been my mistake.
arrows on diameter callout for the M4 are outside of the hole (looks like it was like that on my version too. I forgot when I was working on the model I noticed that was incorrect size, and the drawing tool didn't automatically update)
C under Rev column isn't aligned and its bothering me

Sending these files to @jessica to have sent to our suppliers

step file for heat sink also pushed now

@jessica I pushed a step file for the heat break to the branch for this ticket under taz-olive, exported from Kent's file

@kent PP-MP0113 feedback:
The A datum is a theoretical axis that is not based on anything physical, with everything related to it being measured off of it. This prevents it from being able to be used in any actual measurements. A physical feature will need to be selected as the A datum to generate that axis from.

@kent what file did you base the heat break drawing on?

All E3D items now have documentation

All E3D items now have documentation

@kent changes look good

@west it looks like the point where the width decreases has 4 radii, but is only marked for 2.

@jessica I was gonna ask you the same thing. Sounds like yes. Closed

@west views on page 3 need to be updated

Updated to have a wider slot and use a button head instead of a cap head to compensate. Added the 2 additional M3x8 button heads to the BOM. Could not find M3x8 socket heads on the BOM to remove.

T4499 already used the G revision. That change is likely not being implemented, but the drawing had been sent out to some vendors already. This could cause some confusion if there are two G revs. There are also other pending changes that need to be implemented, such as T4594 and some supplier requested changes. I recommend changing this to H, putting the note from the other rev G in this one so it is logged in the revision control, but then reverted in H, and then also try to get the other needed changes into this rev H as well.

My current understanding is that the vendor who requested these changes is no longer going to be a supplier for this project at this time. Another supplier has just sent samples of a different change they requested, which did not include the changes this ticket is for. As far as I am aware, the changes in this ticket are not necessarily beneficial to the suppliers we are proceeding with. We may want to kill this one, and then figure out the version weirdness this has created, as the documents from this have been sent out and could cause confusion if we have another rev G. For instance, T4495 was also labeled as rev G, because I had forgotten about this.

@tutley good catch, that would have been unfortunate. Updated drawing pushed.

Updated drawing pushed. @tutley please take a look and see if you find it satisfactory.

Since the screw furthest from the flange is a flat head and the other is not, I feel that ideally the flange to the furthest hole should be held the tightest, and then the other hole held to that hole. The flange is intended to sit against the bedplate to keep the block from being rotated, so I think we would best accomplish that goal by not allowing too much wiggle room between the flange and the bedplate. The side-to-side positioning of the holes is not as important, as long as the side-to-side relation between them is held.
See quickly changed drawing with 3 circled changes that I messed up on and then corrected in inkscape:

I did notice it also keeps the continuous option selected if you back out and come back in without manually de-selecting it, so clearing that status upon return to the screen does seem like a good choice.

@kent
rev should be IR (initial revision) and not A
angles for V groove

Another issue has been found with this drawing. EL-MS0142 on the right side is listed as 4x and should only be 2x.

@kent @Steven we have a supplier waiting on this updated version of the drawing, if we could prioritize this approval.

Based on my research, there is really not much in the way of actually open source options. Likely going to be another existing E3D Titan (aero or aqua), or something designed in-house. There was some work done early in Quiver by @west on custom toolheads, which we were able to get to extrude with some prototypes we machined. We did not get any further than just simply pushing plastic, as that was all the further we got when we decided to go with the Titan. But, that is some work to go off of, if we decide to go that route.

@logan currently, you can not as far as I am aware. Please see T4687

All Igus cable chains are now documented

We have received documentation covering all Igus supplied cable chains

we now have documentation for:
HD-MS0287 (spacer)

we now have documentation for:
HD-MS0287 (spacer for bed washers)

@west the implementation of the center line across two views is odd. I think we should nix that and just call it out off of the edge from the same view.

@DaniAO Thank you, I have filed that along with the rest.

Documentation received for:
EL-MT0056 (Motor, Moons 4118S-08P-07RO)

@logan They are not supposed to be powder coated, but the alpha units were not properly masked. See T4593

@kent @Steven ready for review

Documentation received for:
HD-WA0040

Documentation received for:
HD-WA0038
HD-WA0040
HD-MS0055

@karrad There does appear to be a Marlin issue (T4687) related to this that may ultimately prevent this from fully working until it is fixed, but we still need other things that could be worked on as well. This fix adds a M108 to the resume process, but that is only part of the issue. We will want Cura to be able to notice the pause, so that Cura knows to stop sending commands, and also so that a resume button can be enabled so resume can be sent.

I generated a .step and added it to the ticket branch, which has been sent along to PMM (who emailed me directly looking for it.)

Corrections made in ticket specific branch and ready for review @Steven @kent

I have pushed the two non-fan updated drawings to a ticket specific branch